Start Submission Become a Reviewer

Editorial Policies

Peer Review Process

All articles submitted to Bulletin of the History of Archaeology are initially assessed by an Editor, who decides whether or not the article is suitable for peer review. Submissions considered suitable for peer review are assigned to one or more independent experts, who assess the article for clarity, validity, and sound methodology.

Bulletin of the History of Archaeology operates a closed peer review process, meaning that reviewers remain anonymous. The review period is expected to take no longer than three weeks. Reviewers are asked to provide formative feedback, even if an article is not deemed suitable for publication in the journal.

Based on the reviewer reports the editor will make a recommendation for rejection, minor or major revisions, or acceptance. Overall editorial responsibility rests with the journal’s Editor-in-Chief, who is supported by an expert, international Editorial Board.

Section Policies

Announcements

  • Open Submissions
  • Indexed
  • Peer Reviewed

Book Reviews

  • Open Submissions
  • Indexed
  • Peer Reviewed

Conference Reports

  • Open Submissions
  • Indexed
  • Peer Reviewed

Correction

  • Open Submissions
  • Indexed
  • Peer Reviewed

Discourses on the History of Archaeology

  • Open Submissions
  • Indexed
  • Peer Reviewed

General

  • Open Submissions
  • Indexed
  • Peer Reviewed

Oral History

  • Open Submissions
  • Indexed
  • Peer Reviewed

Publications

  • Open Submissions
  • Indexed
  • Peer Reviewed

Research Notes

  • Open Submissions
  • Indexed
  • Peer Reviewed

Research Papers

  • Open Submissions
  • Indexed
  • Peer Reviewed

Resources for Researchers

  • Open Submissions
  • Indexed
  • Peer Reviewed

Reports on Research Projects

  • Open Submissions
  • Indexed
  • Peer Reviewed

Upcoming Events

  • Open Submissions
  • Indexed
  • Peer Reviewed

Quick links